Paper detail

Global change in action due to trapping, how to derive it whatever the rate of variation of the dynamics

In this paper, we investigate the motion of a set of charged particles acted upon by a growing electrostatic wave, in the limit when the initial wave amplitude is vanishingly small and when all the particles have the same initial action, $I_0$. We show, both theoretically and numerically that, when all the particles have been trapped in the wave potential, the distribution in action exhibits a very sharp peak about the smallest action. Moreover, as the wave keeps growing, the most probable action tends towards a constant, $I_f$, which we estimate theoretically. In particular, we show that $I_f$ may be calculated very accurately, when the particles' motion before trapping is far from adiabatic, by making use of a perturbation analysis in the wave amplitude. This fills a gap regarding the computation of the action change which, in the past, has only been addressed for slowly varying dynamics. Moreover, when the variations of the dynamics are fast enough, we show that the Fourier components of the particles' distribution function can be calculated by connecting estimates from our perturbation analysis with those obtained by assuming that all the particles have the same constant action, $I=I_f$. This result is used to compute theoretically the imaginary part of the electron susceptibility of an electrostatic wave in a plasma. Moreover, using our formula for the electron susceptibility, we can extend the range in $ε_a$ (the parameter that quantifies the slowness of the dynamics) for our perturbative estimate of $I_f-I_0$. This range can actually be pushed down to values of $ε_a$ allowing the use of neo-adiabatic techniques to compute the jump in action. Hence, this paper shows that the action change due to trapping can be calculated theoretically, whatever the rate of variation of the dynamics, by connecting perturbative results with neo-adiabatic ones.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.