Paper detail

Global and Asymptotically Efficient Localization from Range Measurements

We consider the range-based localization problem, which involves estimating an object's position by using $m$ sensors, hoping that as the number $m$ of sensors increases, the estimate converges to the true position with the minimum variance. We show that under some conditions on the sensor deployment and measurement noises, the LS estimator is strongly consistent and asymptotically normal. However, the LS problem is nonsmooth and nonconvex, and therefore hard to solve. We then devise realizable estimators that possess the same asymptotic properties as the LS one. These estimators are based on a two-step estimation architecture, which says that any $\sqrt{m}$-consistent estimate followed by a one-step Gauss-Newton iteration can yield a solution that possesses the same asymptotic property as the LS one. The keypoint of the two-step scheme is to construct a $\sqrt{m}$-consistent estimate in the first step. In terms of whether the variance of measurement noises is known or not, we propose the Bias-Eli estimator (which involves solving a generalized trust region subproblem) and the Noise-Est estimator (which is obtained by solving a convex problem), respectively. Both of them are proved to be $\sqrt{m}$-consistent. Moreover, we show that by discarding the constraints in the above two optimization problems, the resulting closed-form estimators (called Bias-Eli-Lin and Noise-Est-Lin) are also $\sqrt{m}$-consistent. Plenty of simulations verify the correctness of our theoretical claims, showing that the proposed two-step estimators can asymptotically achieve the Cramer-Rao lower bound.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.