Paper detail

Glider Representation Rings with a view on distinguishing groups

Let $G$ be a finite group. In the first part of the paper we develop further the foundations of the youngly introduced glider representation theory. Glider representations encompass filtered modules over filtered rings and as such carry much information of $G$. Therefore the main focus is on the glider representation ring $R_d(\widetilde{G})$, which is shown to be realisable as a concrete subring of the split Grothendieck ring of the monoidal category $\text{glid}_d(G)$ of (Noetherian) glider $\mathbb{C}$-representations of (length $d$) of $G$. In the second part we investigate a Wedderburn-Malcev type decomposition of the (infinite-dimensional) $\mathbb{Q}$-algebra $\mathbb{Q}(\widetilde{G}) := \mathbb{Q} \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}R_1(\widetilde{G})$. The main theorem obtains a $\mathbb{Q}[G^{ab}]$-module decomposition of $\mathbb{Q}(\widetilde{G})$ relating it in a precise way to $\mathbb{C}$-representation theory of subnormal subgroups in $G$. Under certain vanishing assumptions, which are proven to hold for nilpotent groups (of class $2$), the second main theorem completely describes a $\mathbb{Q}[G^{ab}]$-algebra decomposition. We end with pointing out applications on distinguishing isocategorical groups.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.