Paper detail

Gleason Score Prediction using Deep Learning in Tissue Microarray Image

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men around the world. The most accurate method to evaluate lesion levels of PCa is microscopic inspection of stained biopsy tissue and estimate the Gleason score of tissue microarray (TMA) image by expert pathologists. However, it is time-consuming for pathologists to identify the cellular and glandular patterns for Gleason grading in large TMA images. We used Gleason2019 Challenge dataset to build a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to segment TMA images to regions of different Gleason grades and predict the Gleason score according to the grading segmentation. We used a pre-trained model of prostate segmentation to increase the accuracy of the Gleason grade segmentation. The model achieved a mean Dice of 75.6% on the test cohort and ranked 4th in the Gleason2019 Challenge with a score of 0.778 combined of Cohen's kappa and the f1-score.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.