Paper detail

GJMS-type Operators on a compact Riemannian manifold: Best constants and Coron-type solutions

In this paper we investigate the existence of solutions to a nonlinear elliptic problem involving critical Sobolev exponent for a polyharmonic operator on a Riemannian manifold $M$. We first show that the best constant of the Sobolev embedding on a manifold can be chosen as close as one wants to the Euclidean one, and as a consequence derive the existence of minimizers when the energy functional goes below a quantified threshold. Next, higher energy solutions are obtained by Coron's topological method, provided that the minimizing solution does not exist. To perform this topological argument, we overcome the difficulty of dealing with polyharmonic operators on a Riemannian manifold and adapting Lions's concentration-compactness lemma. Unlike Coron's original argument for a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$, we need to do more than chopping out a small ball from the manifold $M$. Indeed, our topological assumption that a small sphere on $M$ centred at a point $p \in M$ does not retract to a point in $M\backslash \{ p \}$ is necessary, as shown for the case of the canonical sphere where chopping out a small ball is not enough.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.