Paper detail

Giants eating giants: Mass loss and giant planets modifying the luminosity of the Tip of the Giant Branch

During the red giant phase, stars loose mass at the highest rate since birth. The mass-loss rate is not fixed, but varies from star-to-star by up to 5\%, resulting in variations of the star's luminosity at the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB). Also, most stars, during this phase, engulf part of their planetary system, including their gas giant planets and possibly brown dwarfs. Gas giant planet masses range between 0.1 to 2\% of the host star mass. The engulfing of their gas giants planets can modify their luminosity at the TRGB, i.e. the point at which the He-core degeneracy is removed. We show that the increase in mass of the star by the engulfing of the gas giant planets only modifies the luminosity of a star at the TRGB by less than 0.1\%, while metallicity can modify the luminosity of a star at the TRGB by up to 0.5\%. However, the increase in turbulence of the convective envelope of the star, has a more dramatic effect, on the star's luminosity, which we estimate could be as large as 5\%. The effect is always in the direction to increase the turbulence and thus the mixing length which turns into a systematic decrease of the luminosity of the star at the TRGB. We find that the star-to-star variation of the mass-loss rate will dominate the variations in the luminosity of the TRGB with a contribution at the 5\% level. If the star-to-star variation is driven by environmental effects, the same effects can potentially create an environmentally-driven mean effect on the luminosity of the tip of the red giant branch of a galaxy. Engulfment of a brown dwarf will have a more dramatic effect. Finally, we touch upon how to infer the frequency, and identify the engulfment, of exoplanets in low-metallicity RGB stars through high resolution spectroscopy as well as how to quantify mass loss rate distributions from the morphology of the horizontal branch.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.