Paper detail

Giant Impact onto a Vesta-Like Asteroid and Formation of Mesosiderites through Mixing of Metallic Core and Surface Crust

Mesosiderites are a type of stony-iron meteorites composed of a mixture of silicates and Fe-Ni metals. The mesosiderite silicates and metals are considered to have originated from the crust and metal core, respectively, of a differentiated asteroid. In contrast, mesosiderites rarely contain the olivine that is mainly included in a mantle. Although a giant impact onto a differentiated asteroid is considered to be a probable mechanism to mix crust and metal materials to form mesosiderites, it is not obvious how such a giant impact can form mesosiderite-like materials without including mantle materials. We conducted numerical simulations of giant impacts onto differentiated asteroids, using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method, to investigate the detailed distribution of mixed materials on the resultant bodies. For the internal structure of a target body, we used a thin-crust model derived from the magma ocean crystallization model of the asteroid Vesta and a thick-crust and a large-core model suggested from the proximity observation of Vesta by the Dawn probe. In the simulations with the former model, excavation of the metal core requires nearly catastrophic impacts and mantle is exposed over large surface areas. Thus, stony-iron materials produced on its surface are likely to include mantle materials and it is difficult to produce mesosiderite-like materials. Conversely, in the simulations with the latter model, mantle materials are exposed only at impact sites, even when the impacts excavate the metal core, and the formation of a surface with little mantle material and the formation of mesosiderite-like materials are possible. Therefore, our simulations suggest that an internal structure with a thick crust and a large core is more likely as a mesosiderite parent body rather than the thin-crust internal structure inferred from the conventional magma ocean model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.