Paper detail

GES Model :Combining Pearson Correlation Coefficient Analysis with Multilayer Perceptron

With the development of technological progress, mining on asteroids is becoming a reality. This paper focuses on how to distribute asteroid mineral resources in a reasonable way to ensure global equity. To distribute asteroid resources fairly, 7 primary indicators and 20 secondary indicators are introduced to build a mathematical model to evaluate global equity and the weights are given by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Then Global Equity Score(GES) Model based on 12 primary indicators and 40 secondary indicators is built and TOPSIS method is applied to rank all countries. A t-distribution probability density function is applied to simulate the rate of asteroid mining. The Backward Algorithm is applied to quantitatively measure the impact of changing indicators on global equity. Then Pearson correlation coefficient analysis is conducted for each indicator, and t-test is performed lastly. The results demonstrate that asteroid mining promotes global equity that poor countries can be allocated slightly more mineral resources, and a schedule of the implementation of each measure is given. To gain more insight, sensitivity analysis is conducted and the results demonstrate that scores vary less than 7%. It can be concluded that our GES model have great potential as its robustness, accuracy and strengths.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.