Paper detail

Germanium Detector Response to Nuclear Recoils in Searching for Dark Matter

The discrepancies in claims of experimental evidence in the search for weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter necessitate a model for ionization efficiency (the quenching factor) at energies below 10 keV. We have carefully studied the physics processes that contribute to the ionization efficiency through stopping power. The focus of this work is the construction of a model for the ionization efficiency in germanium by analyzing the components of stopping power, specifically that of the nuclear stopping power, at low energies. We find a fraction of the ZBL nuclear stopping power can contribute to ionization efficiency. We propose a model that corrects the missing contribution to ionization efficiency from the ZBL nuclear stopping power. The proposed model is compared to previous measurements of ionization efficiency in germanium as well as that of other theoretical models. Using this new model, the thresholds of both CDMS II and CoGeNT are analyzed and compared in terms of the nuclear recoil energy.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.