Paper detail

Geometry of epithelial cells provides a robust method for image based inference of stress within tissues

Cellular mechanics plays an important role in epithelial morphogenesis, a process wherein cells reshape and rearrange to produce tissue-scale deformations. However, the study of tissue-scale mechanics is impaired by the difficulty of direct measurement of stress in-vivo. Alternative, image-based inference schemes aim to estimate stress from snapshots of cellular geometry but are challenged by sensitivity to fluctuations and measurement noise as well as the dependence on boundary conditions. Here we overcome these difficulties by introducing a new variational approach - the Geometrical Variation Method (GVM) - which exploits the fundamental duality between stress and cellular geometry that exists in the state of mechanical equilibrium of discrete mechanical networks that approximate cellular tissues. In the Geometrical Variation Method, the two dimensional apical geometry of an epithelial tissue is approximated by a 2D tiling with Circular Arc Polygons (CAP) in which the arcs represent intercellular interfaces defined by the balance of local line tension and pressure differentials between adjacent cells. We take advantage of local constraints that mechanical equilibrium imposes on CAP geometry to define a variational procedure that extracts the best fitting equilibrium configuration from images of epithelial monolayers. The GVM-based stress inference algorithm has been validated by the comparison of the predicted cellular and mesoscopic scale stress and measured myosin II patterns in the epithelial tissue during Drosophila embryogenesis. GVM prediction of mesoscopic stress tensor correlates at the 80% level with the measured myosin distribution and reveals that most of the myosin II activity is involved in a static internal force balance within the epithelial layer. Lastly, this study provides a practical method for non-destructive estimation of stress in live epithelial tissues.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.