Paper detail

Geometry of Defects in Solids

The appealing connection between non-Euclidean geometries and defects in solids is brought forth in this article. Drawing a correspondence between the nature of a defect and a specific geometric property of the material space not only illuminates the underlying structure of defects in solids but also provides an unambiguous way to represent defect densities within a physical theory. We present a rigorous background of the relevant concepts from classical differential geometry, as well as illustrations of isolated defects in a lattice, to motivate the relationship between continuous defect densities and various tensor fields in differential geometry. We identify the Riemann-Christoffel tensor (or curvature tensor), the Cartan tensor (or torsion tensor), and the nonmetricity tensor (obtained from the covariant derivative of the metric tensor), associated with the material space, with the density of disclinations, dislocations, and point-defects (vacancies, interstitials, substitutional), respectively. We end our discussion with remarks on the elastic stress field associated with defect distribution and on the analogy between the present theory and the general theory of relativity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.