Paper detail

Geometry and inclination of the broad line region in blazars

We study the properties of the broad line region in blazars by comparing the virial estimate of black hole masses with that derived from the mass of the host galaxies. The former is sensitive to the width of broad lines, i.e., to the projection of the velocity of line-emitting clouds along the line of sight; the latter is not. This comparison allows us to constrain the deprojection factor f, thus revealing general properties of the geometry of the broad line region. We show that blazars tend to have 1) higher f values than the quasars of our reference sample: <f_{BLLacs}>=6.9 +/- 2.3, <f_{blazars}>=5.6 +/- 1.3 and <f_{quasars}>=2.0 +/- 0.3; 2) relatively narrow broad emission lines; 3) modest equivalent widths, as expected because of the occurrence of jet emission at very low inclination angles. In a disc-like sketch of the broad line region, these results indicate a pole-on view of a flat geometry in blazars. This consistently extends the orientation--dependent unified model of active nuclei to the geometry of the broad line region.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.