Paper detail

Geometric phases and quantum entanglement as building blocks for nonabelian quasiparticle statistics

Some models describing unconventional fractional quantum Hall states predict quasiparticles that obey nonabelian quantum statistics. The most prominent example is the Moore-Read model for the $ν=5/2$ state, in which the ground state is a superconductor of composite fermions, and the charged excitations are vortices in that superconductor. In this paper we develop a physical picture of the nonabelian statistics of these vortices. Considering first the positions of the vortices as fixed, we define a set of single-particle states at and near the core of each vortex, and employ general properties of the corresponding Bogolubov-deGennes equations to write the ground states in the Fock space defined by these single-particle states. We find all ground states to be entangled superpositions of all possible occupations of the single-particle states near the vortex cores, in which the probability for all occupations is equal, and the relative phases vary from one ground state to another. Then, we examine the evolution of the ground states as the positions of the vortices are braided. We find that as vortices move, they accumulate a geometric phase that depends on the occupations of the single-particle states near the cores of other vortices. Thus, braiding of vortices changes the relative phase between different components of a superposition, in which the occupations of the single-particle states differ, and hence transform the system from one ground state to another. These transformations are the source of the nonabelian statistics. Finally, by exploring a "self-similar" form of the many-body wave functions of the ground states, we show the equivalence of our picture and pictures derived previously, in which vortex braiding seemingly affects the occupations of states in the cores of the vortices.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.