Paper detail

Geometric characterizations of the representation type of hereditary algebras and of canonical algebras

We show that a finite connected quiver Q with no oriented cycles is tame if and only if for each dimension vector $\mathbf{d}$ and each integral weight $θ$ of Q, the moduli space $\mathcal{M}(Q,\mathbf{d})^{ss}_θ$ of $θ$-semi-stable $\mathbf{d}$-dimensional representations of Q is just a projective space. In order to prove this, we show that the tame quivers are precisely those whose weight spaces of semi-invariants satisfy a certain log-concavity property. Furthermore, we characterize the tame quivers as being those quivers Q with the property that for each Schur root $\mathbf{d}$ of Q, the field of rational invariants $k(rep(Q,\mathbf{d}))^{GL(\mathbf{d})}$ is isomorphic to $k$ or $k(t)$. Next, we extend this latter description to canonical algebras. More precisely, we show that a canonical algebra $Λ$ is tame if and only if for each generic root $\mathbf{d}$ of $Λ$ and each indecomposable irreducible component C of $rep(Λ,\mathbf{d})$, the field of rational invariants $k(C)^{GL(\mathbf{d})}$ is isomorphic to $k$ or $k(t)$. Along the way, we establish a general reduction technique for studying fields of rational invariants on Schur irreducible components of representation varieties.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.