Paper detail

Geometric aspects of the symmetric inverse M-matrix problem

We investigate the symmetric inverse M-matrix problem from a geometric perspective. The central question in this geometric context is, which conditions on the k-dimensional facets of an n-simplex S guarantee that S has no obtuse dihedral angles. First we study the properties of an n-simplex S whose k-facets are all nonobtuse, and generalize some classical results by Fiedler. We prove that if all (n-1)-facets of an n-simplex S are nonobtuse, each makes at most one obtuse dihedral angle with another facet. This helps to identify a special type of tetrahedron, which we will call sub-orthocentric, with the property that if all tetrahedral facets of S are sub-orthocentric, then S is nonobtuse. Rephrased in the language of linear algebra, this constitutes a purely geometric proof of the fact that each symmetric ultrametric matrix is the inverse of a weakly diagonally dominant M-matrix. Review papers support our belief that the linear algebraic perspective on the inverse M-matrix problem dominates the literature. The geometric perspective however connects sign properties of entries of inverses of a symmetric positive definite matrix to the dihedral angle properties of an underlying simplex, and enables an explicit visualization of how these angles and signs can be manipulated. This will serve to formulate purely geometric conditions on the k-facets of an n-simplex S that may render S nonobtuse also for k>3. For this, we generalize the class of sub-orthocentric tetrahedra that gives rise to the class of ultrametric matrices, to sub-orthocentric simplices that define symmetric positive definite matrices A with special types of k x k principal submatrices for k>3. Each sub-orthocentric simplices is nonobtuse, and we conjecture that any simplex with sub-orthocentric facets only, is sub-orthocentric itself.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.