Paper detail

Geological Mapping and Chronology of Lunar Landing Sites: Apollo 11

Crater size-frequency distribution (CSFDs) measurements allow the derivation of absolute model ages (AMAs) for geological units across various terrestrial bodies in the Solar System based on body-specific adjustments to the lunar chronology (e.g., Hartmann, 1970; Neukum et al., 1975, 1983, 2001; Stoeffler et al., 2001, 2006; Hiesinger et al., 2012; Robbins, 2014). Thus, it is important to revisit and test the accuracy of the lunar chronology using data from recent lunar missions (e.g., Hiesinger et al., 2000, 2012, 2015; Rajmon and Spudis, 2004; Stoeffler et al., 2006), as well as newer analyses of lunar samples (e.g., Gaffney et al. 2011, Meyer, 2012; Snape et al., 2016; Welsh et al., 2018). We generated a new detailed geological map of the Apollo 11 landing region based on spectral characteristics, topography, and albedo maps, which shows several mare units adjacent to the lunar module. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) images were used to measure new CSFDs and derive the cumulative number of craters with diameters greater than or equal to 1 km or N(1) for the Apollo 11 landing site. The newly derived N(1) values are consistent with the presence of only one surficial unit at the landing site: the Group A, High-K (high potassium) young mare basalt (Meyer, 2012). We reviewed the radiometric ages for Apollo 11 samples that have been determined since the calibration of the lunar cratering chronology, used our new geological map to reinterpret their provenance, and correlated them with the new N(1) values. These are plotted and compared with the lunar chronology of Neukum et al. (1983). Our calibration point for the Apollo 11 landing site is consistent with the earlier values, thus, confirming Neukum's (1983) lunar chronology curve.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.