Paper detail

Geodesics in a Graph of Perfect Matchings

Let $\mathscr{P}_{m}$ be the graph on the set of perfect matchings in the complete graph $K_{2m}$, where two perfect matchings are connected by an edge if their symmetric difference is a cycle of length four. This paper studies geodesics in $\mathscr{P}_{m}$. The diameter of $\mathscr{P}_{m}$, as well as the eccentricity of each vertex, are shown to be $m-1$. Two proof are given to show that the number of geodesics between any two antipodes is $m^{m-2}$. The first is a direct proof via a recursive formula, and the second is via reduction to the number of minimal factorizations of a given $m$-cycle in the symmetric group $S_m$. An explicit formula for the number of geodesics between any two matchings in $\mathscr{P}_{m}$ is also given. Let $\mathscr{M}_m$ be the graph on the set of non-crossing perfect matchings of $2m$ labeled points on a circle with the same adjacency condition as in $\mathscr{P}_m$. $\mathscr{M}_m$ is an induced subgraph of $\mathscr{P}_m$, and it is shown that $\mathscr{M}_m$ has exactly one pair of antipodes having the maximal number ($m^{m-2}$) of geodesics between them.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.