Paper detail

Geodesics and flows in a Poissonian city

The stationary isotropic Poisson line process was used to derive upper bounds on mean excess network geodesic length in Aldous and Kendall [Adv. in Appl. Probab. 40 (2008) 1-21]. The current paper presents a study of the geometry and fluctuations of near-geodesics in the network generated by the line process. The notion of a "Poissonian city" is introduced, in which connections between pairs of nodes are made using simple "no-overshoot" paths based on the Poisson line process. Asymptotics for geometric features and random variation in length are computed for such near-geodesic paths; it is shown that they traverse the network with an order of efficiency comparable to that of true network geodesics. Mean characteristics and limiting behavior at the center are computed for a natural network flow. Comparisons are drawn with similar network flows in a city based on a comparable rectilinear grid. A concluding section discusses several open problems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.