Paper detail

Genus and spot density in the COBE DMR first year anisotropy maps

A statistical analysis of texture on the {\it COBE}-DMR first year sky maps based on the genus and spot number is presented. A generalized $χ^2$ statistic is defined in terms of ``observable'' quantities: the genus and spot density that would be measured by different cosmic observers. This strategy together with the use of Monte Carlo simulations of the temperature fluctuations, including all the relevant experimental parameters, represent the main difference with previous analyses. Based on the genus analysis we find a strong anticorrelation between the quadrupole amplitude $Q_{rms-PS}$ and the spectral index $n$ of the density fluctuation power spectrum at recombination of the form $Q_{rms-PS}= 22.2 \pm 1.7 - (4.7 \pm 1.3) \times n\ μ$K for fixed $n$, consistent with previous works. The result obtained based on the spot density is consistent with this $Q_{rms-PS} (n)$ relation. In addition to the previous results we have determined, using Monte Carlo simulations, the minimum uncertainty due to cosmic variance for the determination of the spectral index with the genus analysis. This uncertainty is $δn\approx 0.2$.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.