Paper detail

Genomic data analysis in tree spaces

Recently, an elegant approach in phylogenetics was introduced by Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann that allows a systematic comparison of different evolutionary histories using the metric geometry of tree spaces. In many problem settings one encounters heavily populated phylogenetic trees, where the large number of leaves encumbers visualization and analysis in the relevant evolutionary moduli spaces. To address this issue, we introduce tree dimensionality reduction, a structured approach to reducing large phylogenetic trees to a distribution of smaller trees. We prove a stability theorem ensuring that small perturbations of the large trees are taken to small perturbations of the resulting distributions. We then present a series of four biologically motivated applications to the analysis of genomic data, spanning cancer and infectious disease. The first quantifies how chemotherapy can disrupt the evolution of common leukemias. The second examines a link between geometric information and the histologic grade in relapsed gliomas, where longer relapse branches were specific to high grade glioma. The third concerns genetic stability of xenograft models of cancer, where heterogeneity at the single cell level increased with later mouse passages. The last studies genetic diversity in seasonal influenza A virus. We apply tree dimensionality reduction to 24 years of longitudinally collected H3N2 hemagglutinin sequences, generating distributions of smaller trees spanning between three and five seasons. A negative correlation is observed between the influenza vaccine effectiveness during a season and the variance of the distributions produced using preceding seasons' sequence data. We also show how tree distributions relate to antigenic clusters and choice of influenza vaccine. Our formalism exposes links between viral genomic data and clinical observables such as vaccine selection and efficacy.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.