Paper detail

Genetic Theory for Cubic Graphs

We propose a partitioning of the set of unlabelled, connected cubic graphs into two disjoint subsets named genes and descendants, where the cardinality of the descendants is much larger than that of the genes. The key distinction between the two subsets is the presence of special edge cut sets, called crackers, in the descendants. We show that every descendant can be created by starting from a finite set of genes, and introducing the required crackers by special breeding operations. We prove that it is always possible to identify genes that can be used to generate any given descendant, and provide inverse operations that enable their reconstruction. A number of interesting properties of genes may be inherited by the descendant, and we therefore propose a natural algorithm that decomposes a descendant into its ancestor genes. We conjecture that each descendant can only be generated by starting with a unique set of ancestor genes. The latter is supported by numerical experiments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.