Paper detail

Genetic evolution of a multi-generational population in the context of interstellar space travels -- Part I: Genetic evolution under the neutral selection hypothesis

We updated the agent based Monte Carlo code HERITAGE that simulates human evolution within restrictive environments such as interstellar, sub-light speed spacecraft in order to include the effects of population genetics. We incorporated a simplified -- yet representative -- model of the whole human genome with 46 chromosomes (23 pairs), containing 2110 building blocks that simulate genetic elements (loci). Each individual is endowed with his/her own diploid genome. Each locus can take 10 different allelic (mutated) forms that can be investigated. To mimic gamete production (sperm and eggs) in human individuals, we simulate the meiosis process including crossing-over and unilateral conversions of chromosomal sequences. Mutation of the genetic information from cosmic ray bombardments is also included. In this first paper of a series of two, we use the neutral hypothesis: mutations (genetic changes) have only neutral phenotypic effects (physical manifestations), implying no natural selection on variations. We will relax this assumption in the second paper. Under such hypothesis, we demonstrate how the genetic patrimony of multi-generational crews can be affected by genetic drift and mutations. It appears that centuries-long deep space travels have small but unavoidable effects on the genetic composition/diversity of the traveling populations that herald substantial genetic differentiation on longer time-scales if the annual equivalent dose of cosmic ray radiation is similar to the Earth radioactivity background at sea level. For larger doses, genomes in the final populations can deviate more strongly with significant genetic differentiation that arises within centuries.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.