Paper detail

Generic method to assess transmutation feasibility for nuclear waste treatment and application to irradiated graphite

Graphite-moderated nuclear reactors have already produced more than 250000 tons of irradiated nuclear graphite, or i-graphite, world-wide. The sustainability of this technology relies on the end-of-life management of its moderator, which is activated into a long-lived nuclear waste, by neutron fluxes, during operating time. In particular, C14 is created. Nuclear transmutation, enabled by laser-driven particle acceleration, has been envisioned as a potential novel treatment scheme for long-lived nuclear waste. By triggering controlled nuclear reactions with energetic particles, long-lived radionuclides could be transformed into stable isotopes. Such a system could treat the C14 nuclei trapped within the i-graphite matrix, which is difficult to isolate by other means. This work performs a quantitative preliminary study of this transmutation scheme, in order to assess its feasibility at an industrial scale. The method used can be transposed to assess any transmutation scheme using a beam of particles directly sent on the material to be treated. First, a nuclear interaction channel which transmutes C14 nuclei without creating new long-lived radionuclides is identified. It consists in the choice of a type of particle, among which protons, gamma photons and neutrons can all be accelerated by laser-matter interaction; and it is completed by the adequate energy at which this particle must be sent on i-graphite. To that end, the nuclear cross-sections of C12, C13 and C14 are reviewed, neglecting other impurities in i-graphite. Then, based on the interaction channel identification, the energy cost of this scheme is estimated. Protons between 1 and 5 MeV make it possible to transmute C14 without creating any new long-lived activity. However, our result show that, even in this favorable reaction channel, the transmutation energy cost is too high for an i-graphite transmutation scheme to be feasible.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.