Paper detail

Generic bivariate multi-point evaluation, interpolation and modular composition with precomputation

Suppose $\mathbb{K}$ is a large enough field and $\mathcal{P} \subset \mathbb{K}^2$ is a fixed, generic set of points which is available for precomputation. We introduce a technique called \emph{reshaping} which allows us to design quasi-linear algorithms for both: computing the evaluations of an input polynomial $f \in \mathbb{K}[x,y]$ at all points of $\mathcal{P}$; and computing an interpolant $f \in \mathbb{K}[x,y]$ which takes prescribed values on $\mathcal{P}$ and satisfies an input $y$-degree bound. Our genericity assumption is explicit and we prove that it holds for most point sets over a large enough field. If $\mathcal{P}$ violates the assumption, our algorithms still work and the performance degrades smoothly according to a distance from being generic. To show that the reshaping technique may have an impact on other related problems, we apply it to modular composition: suppose generic polynomials $M \in \mathbb{K}[x]$ and $A \in \mathbb{K}[x]$ are available for precomputation, then given an input $f \in \mathbb{K}[x,y]$ we show how to compute $f(x, A(x)) \operatorname{rem} M(x)$ in quasi-linear time.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.