Paper detail

Generation of the Symmetric Field by Newton Polynomials in prime Characteristic

Let $N_m = x^m + y^m$ be the $m$-th Newton polynomial in two variables, for $m \geq 1$. Dvornicich and Zannier proved that in characteristic zero three Newton polynomials $N_a, N_b, N_c$ are always sufficient to generate the symmetric field in $x$ and $y$, provided that $a,b,c$ are distinct positive integers such that $(a,b,c)=1$. In the present paper we prove that in case of prime characteristic $p$ the result still holds, if we assume additionally that $a,b,c,a-b,a-c,b-c$ are prime with $p$. We also provide a counterexample in the case where one of the hypotheses is missing. The result follows from the study of the factorization of a generalized Vandermonde determinant in three variables, that under general hypotheses factors as the product of a trivial Vandermonde factor and an irreducible factor. On the other side, the counterexample is connected to certain cases where the Schur polynomials factor as a product of linear factors.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.