Paper detail

Generation of Synthetic Rat Brain MRI scans with a 3D Enhanced Alpha-GAN

Translational brain research using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is becoming increasingly popular as animal models are an essential part of scientific studies and more ultra-high-field scanners are becoming available. Some disadvantages of MRI are the availability of MRI scanners and the time required for a full scanning session (it usually takes over 30 minutes). Privacy laws and the 3Rs ethics rule also make it difficult to create large datasets for training deep learning models. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can perform data augmentation with higher quality than other techniques. In this work, the alpha-GAN architecture is used to test its ability to produce realistic 3D MRI scans of the rat brain. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first time that a GAN-based approach has been used for data augmentation in preclinical data. The generated scans are evaluated using various qualitative and quantitative metrics. A Turing test conducted by 4 experts has shown that the generated scans can trick almost any expert. The generated scans were also used to evaluate their impact on the performance of an existing deep learning model developed for segmenting the rat brain into white matter, grey matter and cerebrospinal fluid. The models were compared using the Dice score. The best results for whole brain and white matter segmentation were obtained when 174 real scans and 348 synthetic scans were used, with improvements of 0.0172 and 0.0129, respectively. Using 174 real scans and 87 synthetic scans resulted in improvements of 0.0038 and 0.0764 for grey matter and CSF segmentation, respectively. Thus, by using the proposed new normalisation layer and loss functions, it was possible to improve the realism of the generated rat MRI scans and it was shown that using the generated data improved the segmentation model more than using the conventional data augmentation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.