Paper detail

Generalizing the Fano inequality further

Interactive statistical decision making (ISDM) features algorithm-dependent data generated through interaction. Existing information-theoretic lower bounds in ISDM largely target expected risk, while tail-sensitive objectives are less developed. We generalize the interactive Fano framework of Chen et al. by replacing the hard success event with a randomized one-bit statistic representing an arbitrary bounded transform of the loss. This yields a Bernoulli f-divergence inequality, which we invert to obtain a two-sided interval for the transform, recovering the previous result as a special case. Instantiating the transform with a bounded hinge and using the Rockafellar-Uryasev representation, we derive lower bounds on the prior-predictive (Bayesian) CVaR of bounded losses. For KL divergence with the mixture reference distribution, the bound becomes explicit in terms of mutual information via Pinsker's inequality.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.