Paper detail

Generalized wave-packet model for studying coherence of matter-wave interferometers

We present a generalized model for the evolution of atomic wave-packets in matter-wave interferometers. This method provides an efficient tool for analyzing the performance of atomic interferometers using atom clouds prepared in a trap as a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) or as a thermal ensemble. Predictions of the model for dynamic properties such as wave-packet size and phase are in excellent agreement with explicit numerical solutions of the non-linear Gross-Pitaevskii equations and enable fast calculations of interferometric performance in regimes where full numerical solutions become impractical. As a starting point, the static Thomas-Fermi (TF) approximation for a BEC in a harmonic trap is generalized to the whole range of atom-atom interaction strengths: from non-interacting atoms (low densities) to the standard TF limit (high atomic densities, as long as the condensate approximation still holds). In particular, this generalization allows a good estimation of atomic cloud properties along the transition from a three-dimensional to a quasi-one-dimensional BEC in an elongated trap. We then develop a theoretical model of wave-packet evolution in time-dependent conditions. The model is applicable for a wide range of dynamical problems involving evolution in time-dependent potentials and in a changing mean-field atomic repulsion due to splitting and separation of wave-packets. We use the model for studying two effects that influence interferometric coherence: imperfect spatial recombination in a two-state interferometer (the so-called "Humpty-Dumpty effect") and phase diffusion due to number uncertainty in the two interferometer arms, which was previously studied thoroughly only for interferometric schemes where the BECs in the two arms stay trapped (for example, in a double-well potential).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.