Paper detail

Generalized Tsirelson's bound from parity symmetry considerations

The Bell experiment is a random game with two binary outcomes whose statistical correlation is given by $E_0(Θ)=-\cos(Θ)$, where $Θ\in [-π, π)$ is an angular input that parameterizes the game setting. The correlation function $E_0(Θ)$ belongs to the affine space ${\cal H} \equiv \left\{E(Θ)\right\}$ of all continuous and differentiable periodic functions $E(Θ)$ that obey the parity symmetry constraints $E(-Θ)=E(Θ)$ and $E(π-Θ)=-E(Θ)$ with $E(0)=-1$ and, furthermore, are strictly monotonically increasing in the interval $[0, π)$. Here we show how to build explicitly local statistical models of hidden variables for random games with two binary outcomes whose correlation function $E(Θ)$ belongs to the affine space ${\cal H}$. This family of games includes the Bell experiment as a particular case. Within this family of random games, the Bell inequality can be violated beyond the Tsirelson bound of $2\sqrt{2}$ up to the maximally allowed algebraic value of 4. In fact, we show that the amount of violation of the Bell inequality is a purely geometric feature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.