Paper detail

Generalized Scaling in Flavor Neutrino Masses

Scaling in flavor neutrino masses $M_{ij}$ ($i,j$=$e,μ,τ$) can be described by two angles: $θ_{SC}$ and the atmospheric neutrino mixing angle $θ_{23}$. For $A$=${\cos ^2}{θ_{SC}}+{\sin ^2}{θ_{SC}}t_{23}^4$ and B=${\cos ^2}{θ_{SC}}-{\sin ^2}{θ_{SC}}t_{23}^2$, where $t_{23}=\tanθ_{23}$, our scaling ansatz dictates that $M_{iτ}/M_{iμ}$ = $- κ_it_{23}$ ($i$=$e,μ,τ$) with $κ_e$=1, $κ_μ$=B/A and $κ_τ$=1/B and leads to the vanishing reactor neutrino mixing angle $θ_{13}=0$. This generalized scaling is naturally realized in seesaw textures. To obtain $θ_{13}\neq 0$ as required by the recent experimental results, we introduce breaking terms of scaling ansatz, which are taken to keep $M_{μτ}/M_{μμ}$ = $- κ_μt_{23}$ intact even at $θ_{13}\neq 0$. We derive relations that connect CP violating phases with phases of flavor neutrino masses, which are found to be numerically supported. The angle $θ_{SC}$ is observed to be $0.91 \lesssim\sin^2θ_{SC}\lesssim 0.93$ for the normal mass hierarchy and $\sin^2θ_{SC}\lesssim 0.33$ for the inverted mass hierarchy. Also observed is the size of $|M_{ee}|$ to be measured in neutrinoless double beta decay, which is 0.001-0.004 eV (0.02 eV-0.05 eV) in the normal (inverted) mass hierarchy.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.