Abstract

In 1845, Bertrand conjectured that for all integers x≥2x\ge2, there exists at least one prime in (x/2,x](x/2, x]. This was proved by Chebyshev in 1860, and then generalized by Ramanujan in 1919. He showed that for any n≥1n\ge1, there is a (smallest) prime RnR_n such that π(x)−π(x/2)≥nπ(x)- π(x/2) \ge n for all x≥Rnx \ge R_n. In 2009 Sondow called RnR_n the nnth Ramanujan prime and proved the asymptotic behavior Rn∼p2nR_n \sim p_{2n} (where pmp_m is the mmth prime). In the present paper, we generalize the interval of interest by introducing a parameter c∈(0,1)c \in (0,1) and defining the nnth cc-Ramanujan prime as the smallest integer Rc,nR_{c,n} such that for all x≥Rc,nx\ge R_{c,n}, there are at least nn primes in (cx,x](cx,x]. Using consequences of strengthened versions of the Prime Number Theorem, we prove that Rc,nR_{c,n} exists for all nn and all cc, that Rc,n∼pn1−cR_{c,n} \sim p_{\frac{n}{1-c}} as n→∞n\to\infty, and that the fraction of primes which are cc-Ramanujan converges to 1−c1-c. We then study finer questions related to their distribution among the primes, and see that the cc-Ramanujan primes display striking behavior, deviating significantly from a probabilistic model based on biased coin flipping; this was first observed by Sondow, Nicholson, and Noe in the case c=1/2c = 1/2. This model is related to the Cramer model, which correctly predicts many properties of primes on large scales, but has been shown to fail in some instances on smaller scales.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.