Paper detail

Generalized pentagonal geometries -- II

A generalized pentagonal geometry PENT($k$,$r$,$w$) is a partial linear space, where every line is incident with $k$ points, every point is incident with $r$ lines, and for each point, $x$, the set of points not collinear with $x$ forms the point set of a Steiner system $S(2,k,w)$ whose blocks are lines of the geometry. If $w = k$, the structure is called a pentagonal geometry and denoted by PENT($k$,$r$). The deficiency graph of a PENT($k$,$r$,$w$) has as its vertices the points of the geometry, and there is an edge between $x$ and $y$ precisely when $x$ and $y$ are not collinear. Our primary objective is to investigate generalized pentagonal geometries PENT($k$,$r$,$w$) where the deficiency graph has girth 4. We describe some construction methods, including a procedure that preserves deficiency graph connectedness, and we prove a number of theorems regarding the existence spectra for $k = 3$ and various values of $w$. In addition, we present some new PENT(4,$r$) (including PENT(4,25)) and PENT(5,$r$) with connected deficiency graphs. Consequently, we prove that there exist pentagonal geometries PENT($k$,$r$) with deficiency graphs of girth at least 5 for $r \ge 13$, $r$ congruent to 1 modulo 4 when $k = 4$, and for $r \ge 200000$, $r$ congruent to 0 or 1 modulo 5 when $k = 5$. We conclude with a discussion of appropriately defined identifying codes for pentagonal geometries.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.