Paper detail

Generalized $n$-locality inequalities in star-network configuration and their optimal quantum violations

Standard multiparty Bell experiments involve a single source shared by a set of observers. In contrast, network Bell experiments feature multiple independent sources, and each of them may distribute physical systems to a set of observers who perform randomly chosen measurements. The $n$-locality scenario in star-network configuration involves $n$ number of edge observers (Alices), a central observer (Bob), and $n$ number of independent sources having no prior correlation. Each Alice shares an independent state with the central observer Bob. Usually, in network Bell experiments, one considers that each party measures only two observables. In this work, we propose a non-trivial generalization of $n$-locality scenario in star-network configuration, where each Alice performs some integer $m$ number of binary-outcome measurements, and the central party Bob performs $2^{m-1}$ binary-outcome measurements. We derive a family of generalized $n$-locality inequalities for any arbitrary $m$. Using {blue}{an elegant} sum-of-squares approach, we derive the optimal quantum violation of the aforementioned inequalities can be attained when each and every Alice measures $m$ number of mutually anticommuting observables. For $m=2$ and $3$, one obtains the optimal quantum value {blue}{for qubit system local to each Alice, and it is sufficient to consider the sharing of} a two-qubit entangled state between each Alice and Bob. We further demonstrate that the optimal quantum violation of $n$-locality inequality for any arbitrary $m$ can be obtained when every Alice shares $\lfloor m/2\rfloor$ copies of two-qubit maximally entangled state with the central party Bob. We also argue that for $m>3$, a single copy of a two-qubit entangled state may not be enough to exhibit the violation of $n$-locality inequality but multiple copies of it can activate the quantum violation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.