Paper detail

Generalized Henneberg stable minimal surfaces

We generalize the classical Henneberg minimal surface by giving an infinite family of complete, finitely branched, non-orientable, stable minimal surfaces in $\mathbb{R}^3$. These surfaces can be grouped into subfamilies depending on a positive integer (called the complexity), which essentially measures the number of branch points. The classical Henneberg surface $H_1$ is characterized as the unique example in the subfamily of the simplest complexity $m=1$, while for $m\geq 2$ multiparameter families are given. The isometry group of the most symmetric example $H_m$ with a given complexity $m\in \mathbb{N}$ is either isomorphic to the dihedral isometry group $D_{2m+2}$ (if $m$ is odd) or to $D_{m+1}\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ (if $m$ is even). Furthermore, for $m$ even $H_m$ is the unique solution to the Björling problem for a hypocycloid of $m+1$ cusps (if $m$ is even), while for $m$ odd the conjugate minimal surface $H_m^*$ to $H_m$ is the unique solution to the Björling problem for a hypocycloid of $2m+2$ cusps.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.