Paper detail

Generalized Global Ranking-Aware Neural Architecture Ranker for Efficient Image Classifier Search

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is a powerful tool for automating effective image processing DNN designing. The ranking has been advocated to design an efficient performance predictor for NAS. The previous contrastive method solves the ranking problem by comparing pairs of architectures and predicting their relative performance. However, it only focuses on the rankings between two involved architectures and neglects the overall quality distributions of the search space, which may suffer generalization issues. A predictor, namely Neural Architecture Ranker (NAR) which concentrates on the global quality tier of specific architecture, is proposed to tackle such problems caused by the local perspective. The NAR explores the quality tiers of the search space globally and classifies each individual to the tier they belong to according to its global ranking. Thus, the predictor gains the knowledge of the performance distributions of the search space which helps to generalize its ranking ability to the datasets more easily. Meanwhile, the global quality distribution facilitates the search phase by directly sampling candidates according to the statistics of quality tiers, which is free of training a search algorithm, e.g., Reinforcement Learning (RL) or Evolutionary Algorithm (EA), thus it simplifies the NAS pipeline and saves the computational overheads. The proposed NAR achieves better performance than the state-of-the-art methods on two widely used datasets for NAS research. On the vast search space of NAS-Bench-101, the NAR easily finds the architecture with top 0.01$\unicode{x2030}$ performance only by sampling. It also generalizes well to different image datasets of NAS-Bench-201, i.e., CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-16-120 by identifying the optimal architectures for each of them.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.