Paper detail

Generalized conditional expectations for quantum retrodiction and smoothing

The inference of a hidden variable's historical value, based on observations before and after the fact, is a controversial subject in quantum mechanics. Here I address the controversy by proposing a formalism that unifies and generalizes some of the previous proposals for the task, including the quantum minimum-mean-square-error estimators proposed by Ohki, the generalized conditional expectation proposed by Accardi and Cecchini, the quantum smoothing theory proposed by Tsang, the optimal observables for parameter estimation proposed by Personick, Belavkin, and Grishanin, and the weak values proposed by Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman. The formalism is based on Ohki's suggestion of a distance between two observables in the Heisenberg picture, which remains well defined for incompatible observables and serves as a more general foundation for quantum inference than Belavkin's nondemolition principle.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.