Paper detail

Generalized Affine Programming & Duality Gap with non-Division Rings

Classical primal-dual affine programming takes place over finite dimensional real vector spaces. This results in beautiful duality theory, connecting the optimal solu- tions of the primal maximization problem and the dual minimization problems. These results include the Existence Duality Theorem, which guarantees optimal solutions to any feasible bounded program; and the Strong Duality Theorem, which implies that optimal solutions for primal and dual programs must have the same objective value. In a common extension of classical affine programming, we see that the Strong Duality does not hold when ring of scalars is the integers. Extension of classical affine programming results to ordered division rings are explored in. In this paper, we describe the generalized setting of affine programming using ordered ring (not necessarily division), and classify the rings for which the Existence Duality Theorem or the Strong Duality Theorem fail.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.