Paper detail

Generalizations of Schöbi's Tetrahedral Dissection

Let v_1, ..., v_n be unit vectors in R^n such that v_i . v_j = -w for i != j, where -1 <w < 1/(n-1). The points Sum_{i=1..n} lambda_i v_i, where 1 >= lambda_1 >= ... >= lambda_n >= 0, form a ``Hill-simplex of the first type&#39;&#39;, denoted by Q_n(w). It was shown by Hadwiger in 1951 that Q_n(w) is equidissectable with a cube. In 1985, Schöbi gave a three-piece dissection of Q_3(w) into a triangular prism c Q_2(1/2) X I, where I denotes an interval and c = sqrt{2(w+1)/3}. The present paper generalizes Schöbi&#39;s dissection to an n-piece dissection of Q_n(w) into a prism c Q_{n-1}(1/(n-1)) X I, where c = sqrt{(n-1)(w+1)/n}. Iterating this process leads to a dissection of Q_n(w) into an n-dimensional rectangular parallelepiped (or ``brick&#39;&#39;) using at most n! pieces. The complexity of computing the map from Q_n(w) to the brick is O(n^2). A second generalization of Schöbi&#39;s dissection is given which applies specifically in R^4. The results have applications to source coding and to constant-weight binary codes.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.