Paper detail

Generalised hardness of approximation and the SCI hierarchy -- On determining the boundaries of training algorithms in AI

Hardness of approximation (HA) -- the phenomenon that, assuming P $\neq$ NP, one can easily compute an $ε$-approximation to the solution of a discrete computational problem for $ε> ε_0 > 0$, but for $ε< ε_0$ it suddenly becomes intractable -- is a core phenomenon in the foundations of computations that has transformed computer science. In this paper we study the newly discovered phenomenon in the foundations of computational mathematics: generalised hardness of approximation (GHA) -- which in spirit is close to classical HA in computer science. However, GHA is typically independent of the P vs. NP question in many cases. Thus, it requires a new mathematical framework that we initiate in this paper. We demonstrate the hitherto undiscovered phenomenon that GHA happens when using AI techniques in order to train optimal neural networks (NNs). In particular, for any non-zero underdetermined linear problem the following phase transition may occur: One can prove the existence of optimal NNs for solving the problem but they can only be computed to a certain accuracy $ε_0 > 0$. Below the approximation threshold $ε_0$ -- not only does it become intractable to compute the NN -- it becomes impossible regardless of computing power, and no randomised algorithm can solve the problem with probability better than 1/2. In other cases, despite the existence of a stable optimal NN, any attempts of computing it below the approximation threshold $ε_0$ will yield an unstable NN. Our results use and extend the current mathematical framework of the Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) hierarchy and facilitate a program for detecting the GHA phenomenon throughout computational mathematics and AI.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.