Paper detail

Generalisations of the Russo-Townsend formulation

As a generalisation of the recent construction by Russo and Townsend, we propose a new approach to generate $\mathsf{U}(1)$ duality-invariant models for nonlinear electrodynamics. It is based on the use of two building blocks: (i) a fixed (but otherwise arbitrary) model for self-dual nonlinear electrodynamics with Lagrangian $L(F_{μν};g)$ depending on a duality-invariant parameter $g$; and (ii) an arbitrary potential $W(ψ)$, with $ψ$ an auxiliary scalar field. It turns out that the model $\mathfrak{L}(F_{μν};ψ) = L(F_{μν};ψ) + W(ψ)$ leads to a self-dual theory for nonlinear electrodynamics upon elimination of $ψ$. As an illustration, we work out two examples in which the seed Lagrangian $L(F_{μν};g)$ corresponds to the Born-Infeld model and two particular potentials $W(ψ)$ are chosen such that integrating out $ψ$ gives: (i) the ModMaxBorn theory; and (ii) the ModMax theory. We also briefly discuss supersymmetric generalisations of the proposed formulation.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.