Paper detail

General Theory of Music by Icosahedron 2: Analysis of musical pieces by the exceptional musical icosahedra

We propose a new way of analyzing musical pieces by using the exceptional musical icosahedra where all the major/minor triads are represented by golden triangles or golden gnomons. First, we introduce a concept of the golden neighborhood that characterizes golden triangles/gnomons that neighbor a given golden triangle or gnomon. Then, we investigate a relation between the exceptional musical icosahedra and the neo-Riemannian theory, and find that the golden neighborhoods and the icosahedron symmetry relate any major/minor triad with any major/minor triad. Second, we show how the exceptional musical icosahedra are applied to analyzing harmonies constructed by four or more tones. We introduce two concepts, golden decomposition and golden singular. The golden decomposition is a decomposition of a given harmony into the minimum number of harmonies constructing the given harmony and represented by the golden figure (a golden triangle, a golden gnomon, or a golden rectangle). A harmony is golden singular if and only if the harmony does not have golden decompositions. We show results of the golden analysis (analysis by the golden decomposition) of the tertian seventh chords and the mystic chord. While the dominant seventh chord is the only tertian seventh chord that is golden singular in the type 1[star] and the type 4[star] exceptional musical icosahedron, the half-diminished seventh chord is the only tertian seventh chord that is golden singular in the type 2 [star] and the type 3[star] exceptional musical icosahedron. Last, we apply the golden analysis to the famous prelude in C major composed by Johann Sebastian Bach (BWV 846). We found 7 combinations of the golden figures on the type 2 [star] or the type 3 [star] exceptional musical icosahedron dually represent all the measures of the BWV 846.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.