Paper detail

General-relativistic instability in hylotropic supermassive stars

The formation of supermassive black holes by direct collapse would imply the existence of supermassive stars (SMSs) and their collapse through the general-relativistic (GR) instability into massive black hole seeds. However, the final mass of SMSs is weakly constrained by existing models, in spite of the importance this quantity plays in the consistency of the direct collapse scenario. We estimate the final masses of spherical SMSs in the whole parameter space relevant for these objects. We build analytical stellar structures (hylotropes) that mimic existing numerical SMS models accounting for full stellar evolution with rapid accretion. From these hydrostatic structures, we determine ab initio the conditions for GR instability, and compare the results with the predictions of full stellar evolution. We show that hylotropic models predict the onset of GR instability with high precision. The mass of the convective core appears as a decisive quantity. The lower it is, the larger is the total mass required for GR instability. Typical conditions for GR instability are a total mass >10^5 Msun with a core mass >10^4 Msun. If the core mass remains below 10^4 Msun, total masses in excess of 10^6-10^7 Msun can be reached. Our results confirm that spherical SMSs forming in primordial, atomically cooled haloes collapse at masses below 500 000 Msun. On the other hand, accretion rates in excess of 1000 Msun/yr, leading to final stellar masses >10^6 Msun, are required for massive black hole formation in metal-rich gas. Thus, the different channels of direct collapse imply distinct final masses for the progenitor of the black hole seed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.