Paper detail

General method for determining the boundary layer thickness in nonequilibrium flows

While the computation of the boundary-layer thickness is straightforward for canonical equilibrium flows, there are no established definitions for general non-equilibrium flows. In this work, a method is developed based on a local reconstruction of the "inviscid" velocity profile $U_I[y]$ resulting from the application of the Bernoulli equation in the wall-normal direction. The boundary-layer thickness $δ_{99}$ is then defined as the location where $U/U_I = 0.99$, which is consistent with its classical definition for the zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers (ZPGBLs). The proposed local-reconstruction method is parameter free and can be deployed for both internal and external flows without resorting to an iterative procedure, numerical integration, or numerical differentiation. The superior performance of the local-reconstruction method over various existing methods is demonstrated by applying the methods to laminar and turbulent boundary layers and two flows over airfoils. Numerical experiments reveal that the local-reconstruction method is more accurate and more robust than existing methods, and it is applicable for flows over a wide range of Reynolds numbers.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.