Paper detail

General Holder Smooth Convergence Rates Follow From Specialized Rates Assuming Growth Bounds

Often in the analysis of first-order methods for both smooth and nonsmooth optimization, assuming the existence of a growth/error bound or KL condition facilitates much stronger convergence analysis. Hence separate analysis is typically needed for the general case and for the growth bounded cases. We give meta-theorems for deriving general convergence rates from those assuming a growth lower bound. Applying this simple but conceptually powerful tool to the proximal point, subgradient, bundle, dual averaging, gradient descent, Frank-Wolfe, and universal accelerated methods immediately recovers their known convergence rates for general convex optimization problems from their specialized rates. New convergence results follow for bundle methods, dual averaging, and Frank-Wolfe. Our results can lift any rate based on Hölder continuous gradients and Hölder growth bounds. Moreover, our theory provides simple proofs of optimal convergence lower bounds under Hölder growth from textbook examples without growth bounds.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.