Paper detail

General considerations on the nature of $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$ from their pole positions

The nature of the bottomonium-like states $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$ is studied by calculating the $B^{(*)}\overline B^{*}$ compositeness ($X$) in those resonances. We first consider uncoupled isovector $S$-wave scattering of $B^{(*)}\overline B^{*}$ within the framework of effective-range expansion (ERE). Expressions for the scattering length ($a$) and effective range ($r$) are derived exclusively in terms of the masses and widths of the two $Z_b$ states. We then develop compositeness within ERE for the resonance case and deduce the expression $X=1/\sqrt{2r/a-1}$, which is then applied to the systems of interest. Finally, the actual compositeness parameters are calculated in terms of resonance pole positions and their experimental branching ratios into $B^{(*)}\overline{B}^*$ by using the method of Ref.[1]. We find the values $X=0.66\pm 0.11$ and $0.51\pm 0.10$ for the $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$, respectively. We also compare the ERE with Breit-Wigner and Flatté parameterizations to discuss the applicability of the last two ones for near-threshold resonances with explicit examples.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.