Paper detail

General Classes of Lower Bounds on the Probability of Error in Multiple Hypothesis Testing

In this paper, two new classes of lower bounds on the probability of error for $m$-ary hypothesis testing are proposed. Computation of the minimum probability of error which is attained by the maximum a-posteriori probability (MAP) criterion is usually not tractable. The new classes are derived using Holder's inequality and reverse Holder's inequality. The bounds in these classes provide good prediction of the minimum probability of error in multiple hypothesis testing. The new classes generalize and extend existing bounds and their relation to some existing upper bounds is presented. It is shown that the tightest bounds in these classes asymptotically coincide with the optimum probability of error provided by the MAP criterion for binary or multiple hypothesis testing problem. These bounds are compared with other existing lower bounds in several typical detection and classification problems in terms of tightness and computational complexity.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.