Paper detail

Gender Identification using MFCC for Telephone Applications - A Comparative Study

Gender recognition is an essential component of automatic speech recognition and interactive voice response systems. Determining gender of the speaker reduces the computational burden of such systems for any further processing. Typical methods for gender recognition from speech largely depend on features extraction and classification processes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of various state-of-the-art classification methods along with tuning their parameters for helping selection of the optimal classification methods for gender recognition tasks. Five classification schemes including k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, multilayer perceptron, random forest, and support vector machine are comprehensively evaluated for determination of gender from telephonic speech using the Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients. Different experiments were performed to determine the effects of training data sizes, length of the speech streams, and parameter tuning on classification performance. Results suggest that SVM is the best classifier among all the five schemes for gender recognition.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.