Paper detail

GDsmith: Detecting Bugs in Graph Database Engines

Graph database engines stand out in the era of big data for their efficiency of modeling and processing linked data. There is a strong need of testing graph database engines. However, random testing, the most practical way of automated test generation, faces the challenges of semantic validity, non-empty result, and behavior diversity to detect bugs in graph database engines. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose GDsmith, the first black-box approach for testing graph database engines. It ensures that each randomly generated Cypher query satisfies the semantic requirements via skeleton generation and completion. GDsmith includes our technique to increase the probability of producing Cypher queries that return non-empty results by leveraging three types of structural mutation strategies. GDsmith also includes our technique to improve the behavior diversity of the generated Cypher queries by selecting property keys according to their previous frequencies when generating new queries. Our evaluation results demonstrate that GDsmith is effective and efficient for automated query generation and substantially outperforms the baseline. GDsmith successfully detects 27 previously unknown bugs on the released versions of three popular open-source graph database engines and receive positive feedback from their developers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.