Paper detail

Gaussian processes, bridges and membranes extracted from selfsimilar random fields

We consider the class of selfsimilar Gaussian generalized random fields introduced by Dobrushin in 1979. These fields are indexed by Schwartz functions on $\mathbb{R}^d$ and parametrized by a self-similarity index and the degree of stationarity of their increments. We show that such Gaussian fields arise in explicit form by letting Gaussian white noise, or Gaussian random balls white noise, drive a shift and scale shot-noise mechanism on $\mathbb{R}^d$, covering both isotropic and anisotropic situations. In some cases these fields allow indexing with a wider class of signed measures, and by using families of signed measures parametrized by the points in euclidean space we are able to extract pointwise defined Gaussian processes, such as fractional Brownian motion on $\mathbb{R}^d$. Developing this method further, we construct Gaussian bridges and Gaussian membranes on a finite domain, which vanish on the boundary of the domain.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.