Paper detail

Gaussian Multiple and Random Access in the Finite Blocklength Regime

This paper presents finite-blocklength achievability bounds for the Gaussian multiple access channel (MAC) and random access channel (RAC) under average-error and maximal-power constraints. Using random codewords uniformly distributed on a sphere and a maximum likelihood decoder, the derived MAC bound on each transmitter's rate matches the MolavianJazi-Laneman bound (2015) in its first- and second-order terms, improving the remaining terms to $\frac12\frac{\log n}{n}+O \left(\frac 1 n \right)$ bits per channel use. The result then extends to a RAC model in which neither the encoders nor the decoder knows which of $K$ possible transmitters are active. In the proposed rateless coding strategy, decoding occurs at a time $n_t$ that depends on the decoder's estimate $t$ of the number of active transmitters $k$. Single-bit feedback from the decoder to all encoders at each potential decoding time $n_i$, $i \leq t$, informs the encoders when to stop transmitting. For this RAC model, the proposed code achieves the same first-, second-, and third-order performance as the best known result for the Gaussian MAC in operation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.